EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
Crusoe Energy Systems - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 6 reporting facilities in 3 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 183K
- Reporting facilities
- 6
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #767
Data updated May 2026
Crusoe Energy Systems averages 31K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 183K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #767 of 2,289
- #113 in Other
- +619.4% since 2021
Crusoe Energy Systems vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
183,091 767th of 2289 higher than 1,522 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Crusoe Energy Systems spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: Crusoe Energy Systems.
Other peer footprint table: Crusoe Energy Systems, 6 facilities, 0.18M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent crusoe-energy-systems · 2023 #767 · 183K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 183K MT
- MID-PACK #767/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH State of Wisconsin · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 6 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-SURGE +619% since 2021
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: State of Wisconsin · Power Plants (±214 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 183K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 183K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 86 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 102 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Crusoe Energy Systems
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Crusoe Energy Systems - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Crusoe Energy Systems's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Crusoe Energy Systems - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2021–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 183K MT
- 3 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Crusoe Energy Systems annual reported GHG emissions, 2021–2023
Crusoe Energy Systems reported 183K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 25K MT in 2021 - a rise of 619.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (6)
How Crusoe Energy Systems's 183K MT CO₂e total splits across its reporting facilities.
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. - Snapper Other Denver, CO | Denver, CO | 64K |
| Crusoe Energy Systems - Crosby Chase CTB Other Mandaree, ND | Mandaree, ND | 41K |
| Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. - Oxbow Other Denver, CO | Denver, CO | 26K |
| Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. - Surprise S4 Other Denver, CO | Denver, CO | 25K |
| Crusoe Energy Systems - Kraken CDP Other Fairview, MT | Fairview, MT | 23K |
| Crusoe Energy Systems, Inc. - Eagle 4-9 Other Denver, CO | Denver, CO | 3K |
Where Crusoe Energy Systems's reported CO₂e sits by state
64.8% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Colorado (4 sites) ; next is North Dakota at 22.6% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Crusoe Energy Systems reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Crusoe Energy Systems. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Other browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (183K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (6 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (31K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Crusoe Energy Systems's emissions profile
- Crusoe Energy Systems runs low-intensity per facility (31K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #767 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.