EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Producers Midstream II - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 5 reporting facilities in 1 state.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 96K
- Reporting facilities
- 5
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #1102
Data updated May 2026
Producers Midstream II averages 19K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 96K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #1102 of 2,289
- #82 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -29.4% since 2011
Producers Midstream II vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
95,610 1102nd of 2289 higher than 1,187 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Producers Midstream II spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Producers Midstream II.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Producers Midstream II, 5 facilities, 0.1M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent producers-midstream-ii · 2023 #1102 · 96K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 96K MT
- MID-PACK #1102/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH City of Conway Arkans… · Waste
- FAC-PAIR 5 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-CUT −29% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Conway Arkansas · Waste (±32 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Producers Midstream II: CH₄ is 7.6% of 96K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 7.7%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 92.3%
- 88K MT
- CH₄
- 7.6%
- 7K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 49 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Producers Midstream II
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Producers Midstream II - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Producers Midstream II's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Producers Midstream II - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 96K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Producers Midstream II annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Producers Midstream II reported 96K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 136K MT in 2011 - a decline of 29.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (5)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| ALLISON GAS PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Allison, TX | Allison, TX | 42K |
| AJAX PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Wheeler, TX | Wheeler, TX | 39K |
| ZYBACH CRYOGENIC PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Briscoe, TX | Briscoe, TX | 11K |
| WHITE WING GAS PROCESSING PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Hermleigh, TX | Hermleigh, TX | 3K |
| HIDETOWN PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems WHEELER, TX | WHEELER, TX | 118 |
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Producers Midstream II. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (96K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (5 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (19K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Producers Midstream II's emissions profile
- Producers Midstream II runs low-intensity per facility (19K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #1102 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.