EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Roxul USA - GHG emissions profile
Scope 1 reported greenhouse-gas emissions across 2 reporting facilities in 2 states, from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.
- MT CO₂e (2023)
- 52K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #1507
Data updated May 2026
Roxul USA is a minerals company that reported 52K metric tons of CO2-equivalent emissions in 2023 across 2 reporting facilities in 2 states, per EPA GHGRP data covering 2014–2023. Emissions increased 389% over the tracked period.
Emissions Insight: Roxul USA
Roxul USA reported 52K metric tons of CO2-equivalent in 2023, placing it at rank #1507 among all EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) reporters and #86 within the Minerals category. The company operates 2 reporting facilities distributed across 2 states, giving an average of approximately 26K metric tons of CO2e per facility. Only sites emitting 25,000+ metric tons of CO2e annually are required to report, so these figures represent the company's largest operational emitters rather than its entire carbon footprint.
Classified in the Minerals sector (NAICS code 327993), Roxul USA sits alongside peers subject to the same reporting thresholds under 40 CFR Part 98. Across the 10 reporting years on record (2014–2023), the data shows a rise of 389.3% in annual emissions. This multi-year lens is critical because year-on-year variation may reflect production volume, fuel mix, facility acquisitions or divestitures, and efficiency upgrades rather than underlying operational intensity.
For analysts and policy users, the key takeaway is that this profile reflects self-reported Scope 1 combustion, process, and fugitive emissions verified by the EPA, not Scope 2 purchased electricity or Scope 3 value-chain emissions. When comparing Roxul USA to other large emitters, weight the 2-facility footprint against the 52K MT total to understand concentration risk. California SB 253 and SEC climate disclosure rules will push many GHGRP reporters toward broader Scope 1–3 reporting over the next reporting cycles, so this EPA baseline will remain the comparable backbone for tracking corporate carbon performance.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Roxul USA - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Roxul USA's largest reporting facilities by cumulative CO₂e
Reported emissions over time
Roxul USA annual reported GHG emissions, 2014–2023
Roxul USA reported 52K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 11K MT in 2014 - a rise of 389.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Roxul USA Inc. dba ROCKWOOL Minerals | Kearneysville, WV | 29K |
| Roxul USA, Inc. Minerals | Byhalia, MS | 23K |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much greenhouse gas does Roxul USA emit? ▼
Roxul USA reported 52K metric tons of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) in 2023, according to EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program data covering 2 reporting facilities across 2 states.
How does Roxul USA rank among U.S. emitters? ▼
Roxul USA is ranked #1507 overall among all EPA GHGRP reporting companies and #86 within the Minerals sector.
Is Roxul USA increasing or decreasing emissions? ▼
Over 10 reporting years (2014–2023), Roxul USA's emissions have increased by 389.3%. This may reflect expanded operations or increased production.
How many facilities does Roxul USA operate? ▼
Roxul USA has 2 facilities reporting to the EPA GHGRP across 2 states. Each facility emitting 25,000+ metric tons of CO2e per year is required to report.
What industry is Roxul USA in? ▼
Roxul USA is classified in the Minerals sector (NAICS code 327993). Industry classification is based on EPA reporting categories.
Where does this emissions data come from? ▼
All data comes from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), which requires U.S. facilities emitting 25,000+ metric tons of CO2e annually to report. Data is self-reported by facilities and undergoes EPA verification.
Emissions guides & analysis
Source: EPA GHGRP EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
Explore more emitters
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure on PlainCarbon is rendered directly from EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.