EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 4 facilities across 1 state (1.8M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.8M
- Reporting facilities
- 4
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #233
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority reported 1.8M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 4 facilities in 1 state (ranks #233 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 8% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #233 of 2,289
- #135 in Power Plants
- -8.4% since 2011
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,786,495 233rd of 2289 higher than 2,056 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).
You are here: Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority.
Power Plants peer footprint table: Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority, 4 facilities, 1.79M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent sacramento-municipal-utility-district-financing-authority · 2023 #233 · 1.8M MT
CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.8M MT
- UPPER-Q #233/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Sunflower Electric Po… · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 4 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-DOWN −8% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Sunflower Electric Power · Power Plants (±7K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 1.8M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 1.8M MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 846 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 1K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financi…
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.8M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority reported 1.8M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 2.0M MT in 2011 - a decline of 8.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (4)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Cosumnes Power Plant Power Plants HERALD, CA | HERALD, CA | 1.1M |
| Procter & Gamble Power Plant Power Plants SACRAMENTO, CA | SACRAMENTO, CA | 317K |
| Campbell Power Plant Power Plants SACRAMENTO, CA | SACRAMENTO, CA | 275K |
| Carson Power Plant Power Plants ELK GROVE, CA | ELK GROVE, CA | 77K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.8M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.8M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (4 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (447K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority's emissions profile
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District Financing Authority runs high-intensity per facility (447K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #233 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.