Procter & Gamble Power Plant
SACRAMENTO, CA · Sacramento · NAICS 221112
Data updated May 2026
Procter & Gamble Power Plant sits in the upper third of EPA GHGRP reporters by latest CO₂e (#1,302 of 8,713 nationally, #76 of 549 in CA).
- National rank #1,302 of 8,713 GHGRP facilities
- #76 of 549 in CA
- #727 of 1,732 in Power Plants
- 17.7% of SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY parent CO₂e
- 2023 mix: 0.1% non-CO₂ (N₂O-led)
- -1.7% since 2011
Procter & Gamble Power Plant vs all U.S. GHGRP facilities
Where this site's latest reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP reporting facility
316,935 1302nd of 8713 higher than 7,411 of 8,713 facilities
GHGRP facilities, banded by latest reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more facilities. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
Facility footprint context
This site accounts for 17.7% of SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY reported parent CO₂e (317K MT of 1.8M MT ; #2 of 4 GHGRP facilities under that parent ). Inside the EPA Power Plants sector it ranks #727 of 1,732 facilities by latest CO₂e. Shares use GHGRP facility rollups only, not Scope 2/3 or non-reporting sites.
2023 gas mix desk
Of 317K MT CO₂e reported for 2023, non-CO₂ gases are 0.1% , led by N₂O at 0.1% . Component shares use this facility's GHGRP CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year (already CO₂e-weighted).
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 317K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 147 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 175 MT
High-emitter reporting timeline
| Year | Total CO2e (MT) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 316,935 |
| 2022 | 341,225 |
| 2021 | 327,002 |
| 2020 | 322,249 |
| 2019 | 346,980 |
| 2018 | 372,626 |
| 2017 | 307,550 |
| 2016 | 360,474 |
| 2015 | 390,807 |
| 2014 | 380,906 |
| 2013 | 399,218 |
| 2012 | 365,051 |
| 2011 | 322,507 |
Facility insight: Procter & Gamble Power Plant
Procter & Gamble Power Plant (GHGRP ID 1001129) is a high-volume reporter at 317K MT CO₂e in 2023 from SACRAMENTO, CA (#1,302 of 8,713 nationally) under Power Plants (NAICS 221112).
Over 13 years (2011–2023), emissions stayed within a narrow band around 317K MT CO₂e (peak 399K MT). This facility has filed every year from 2011 to 2023, a complete 13-year record.
Peak year was 2013 at 399K MT CO2e; latest 2023 sits 20.6% below that peak (317K MT). The largest year-to-year move was 2017→2018 (+21.2%, 65K MT).
Frequently Asked Questions
Where does Procter & Gamble Power Plant rank among U.S. GHGRP facilities? ▼
According to the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program, Procter & Gamble Power Plant ranks #1,302 of 8,713 reporting facilities by latest reported CO₂e, and #76 of 549 facilities in CA (same sort as the state facility table). See /methodology#corpus-placement.
What share of GHGRP facilities report less CO₂e than Procter & Gamble Power Plant? ▼
Procter & Gamble Power Plant's 317K MT CO₂e is higher than 7,411 of the 8,713 GHGRP facilities with reported emissions (85%), an exact count from the full corpus, not an estimate.
How much CO2 does Procter & Gamble Power Plant emit? ▼
Procter & Gamble Power Plant reported 317K MT CO2e in 2023.
What share of SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY does Procter & Gamble Power Plant represent? ▼
Procter & Gamble Power Plant accounts for 17.7% of SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY's reported GHGRP CO₂e (317K MT of 1.8M MT), ranking #2 of 4 facilities under that parent.
What is Procter & Gamble Power Plant's 2023 CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O mix? ▼
In 2023, non-CO₂ gases were 0.1% of reported CO₂e at Procter & Gamble Power Plant, with N₂O the larger non-CO₂ share at 0.1% (CO₂ 99.9%). Shares use the facility's GHGRP gas components for that year.
Where does Procter & Gamble Power Plant rank inside Power Plants? ▼
Among EPA GHGRP facilities tagged Power Plants, Procter & Gamble Power Plant ranks #727 of 1,732 by latest reported CO₂e.
Is Procter & Gamble Power Plant reducing emissions? ▼
Over 13 reporting years (2011–2023), Procter & Gamble Power Plant's emissions have decreased by 1.7%. Emissions have remained relatively stable.
Nationwide facilities with similar CO₂e or sector
Peer sets outside CA for a top-third GHGRP emitter: CO₂e totals first, then Power Plants neighbors.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest latest-year facility totals outside CA (317K MT here).
Similar Power Plants CO₂e
Nearest same-sector facility totals outside CA.