EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 2 facilities across 2 states (589K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 589K
- Reporting facilities
- 2
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #437
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative reported 589K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 2 states (ranks #437 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 17% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #437 of 2,289
- #40 in Minerals
- +17.3% since 2011
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
588,602 437th of 2289 higher than 1,852 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).
You are here: Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative.
Minerals peer footprint table: Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative, 2 facilities, 0.59M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent southern-minnesota-beet-sugar-cooperative · 2023 #437 · 589K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 589K MT
- UPPER-Q #437/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Ahlstrom-Munksjo Nort… · Pulp and Paper
- FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-UP +17% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Ahlstrom-Munksjo North America Specialty Solutions · Pulp and Paper (±2K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.5% of 589K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.5%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.5%
- 586K MT
- CH₄
- 0.2%
- 1K MT
- N₂O
- 0.3%
- 2K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 589K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative reported 589K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 502K MT in 2011 - a rise of 17.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Facilities (2)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN MINNESOTA BEET SUGAR COOPERATIVE Minerals RENVILLE, MN | RENVILLE, MN | 523K |
| HOLLY SUGAR CORP DBA SPRECKELS COMPANY Minerals BRAWLEY, CA | BRAWLEY, CA | 66K |
Where Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative's reported CO₂e sits by state
88.8% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Minnesota (1 site) ; next is California at 11.2% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (589K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (589K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (2 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (294K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative's emissions profile
- Southern Minnesota Beet Sugar Cooperative runs high-intensity per facility (294K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #437 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.