EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals

Spangler Companies - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 18 facilities across 15 states (836K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
836K
Reporting facilities
18
States covered
15
Overall rank
#369
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

836K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Spangler Companies reported 836K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 18 facilities in 15 states (ranks #369 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 79% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #369 of 2,289
  • #35 in Minerals
  • +79.5% since 2011

Spangler Companies vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

836,443 369th of 2289 higher than 1,920 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Spangler Companies spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 05101520 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Minerals
Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers.

You are here: Spangler Companies.

Minerals peer footprint table: Spangler Companies, 18 facilities, 0.84M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent spangler-companies · 2023 #369 · 836K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-NATION · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 836K MT
  • UPPER-Q #369/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Guam Power Authority · Power Plants
  • FAC-MULTI 18 facilities
  • SPAN-NATION 15 states
  • SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
  • TREND-SURGE +80% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Guam Power Authority · Power Plants (±278 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 836K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
836K MT
CH₄
0%
394 MT
N₂O
0.1%
469 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Spangler Companies

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCapital Power Investm… · Pow…841KGerdau USA · Metals · near840KSpangler Companies · Mineral…836KGuam Power Authority · Power…836KYellowstone Energy · Power P…830KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Spangler Companies · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Spangler Companies - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Gold Bond - BAL Plant91KGold Bond - MTH Plant86KGold Bond - APL Plant77KGold Bond - SHI Plant72KGold Bond - MED Plant51KGold Bond - FTD Plant46KGold Bond - MLT Plant45KGold Bond - WLM Plant40K

Spangler Companies's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Spangler Companies - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
836K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.4M0.5M0.6M0.7M0.8M0.9M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.84M

Spangler Companies annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Spangler Companies reported 836K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 466K MT in 2011 - a rise of 79.5% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Wide facility book (18)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Gold Bond - BAL Plant
Minerals
BALTIMORE, MD
91K
Gold Bond - MTH Plant
Minerals
MOUNT HOLLY, NC
86K
Gold Bond - APL Plant
Minerals
GIBSONTON, FL
77K
Gold Bond - SHI Plant
Minerals
SHIPPINGPORT, PA
72K
Gold Bond - MED Plant
Minerals
MEDICINE LODGE, KS
51K
Gold Bond - FTD Plant
Minerals
FORT DODGE, IA
46K
Gold Bond - MLT Plant
Minerals
NEW COLUMBIA, PA
45K
Gold Bond - WLM Plant
Minerals
Wilmington, NC
40K
Gold Bond - ROT Plant
Minerals
ROTAN, TX
39K
Gold Bond - LGB Plant
Minerals
Long Beach, CA
38K
Gold Bond - PRY Plant
Minerals
PRYOR, OK
37K
Gold Bond - SHO Plant
Minerals
SHOALS, IN
36K
Gold Bond - POR Plant
Minerals
PORTSMOUTH, NH
35K
Gold Bond- BUR Plant
Minerals
BURLINGTON, NJ
32K
Gold Bond - SAV Plant
Minerals
Garden City, GA
31K
Gold Bond - RIC Plant
Minerals
Richmond, CA
28K
Gold Bond - ANN Plant
Minerals
Oxford, AL
27K
Gold Bond - WWG Plant
Minerals
Westwego, LA
26K

Where Spangler Companies's reported CO₂e sits by state

15% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in North Carolina (2 sites) ; next is Pennsylvania at 14% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

NC126KPA117KMD91KFL77KCA66KKS51KIA46KTX39K
EPA GHGRP · Spangler Companies facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Spangler Companies reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (836K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Spangler Companies's emissions profile

  • Spangler Companies runs mid-intensity per facility (46K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
  • It ranks #369 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.