EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
The Procter & Gamble - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 9 facilities across 9 states (1.6M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.6M
- Reporting facilities
- 9
- States covered
- 9
- Overall rank
- #245
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, The Procter & Gamble reported 1.6M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 9 facilities in 9 states (ranks #245 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #245 of 2,289
- #18 in Other
- -1.2% since 2011
The Procter & Gamble vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,592,961 245th of 2289 higher than 2,044 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How The Procter & Gamble spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: The Procter & Gamble.
Other peer footprint table: The Procter & Gamble, 9 facilities, 1.59M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent the-procter-gamble · 2023 #245 · 1.6M MT
CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.6M MT
- UPPER-Q #245/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Reorganized Heritage… · Power Plants
- FAC-MULTI 9 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 9 states
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-FLAT −1% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Reorganized Heritage TopCo · Power Plants (±3K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.1% of 1.6M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.9%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.1%
- 1.6M MT
- CH₄
- 0.8%
- 13K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 1K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around The Procter & Gamble
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
The Procter & Gamble - top sites (MT CO₂e)
The Procter & Gamble's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
The Procter & Gamble - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.6M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
The Procter & Gamble annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
The Procter & Gamble reported 1.6M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 1.6M MT in 2011 - a decline of 1.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (9)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Procter & Gamble Paper Products Pulp and Paper MEHOOPANY, PA | MEHOOPANY, PA | 686K |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCTS Pulp and Paper OXNARD, CA | OXNARD, CA | 276K |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCTS CO Pulp and Paper GREEN BAY, WI | GREEN BAY, WI | 191K |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE PAPER PRODUCTS CO Pulp and Paper JACKSON, MO | JACKSON, MO | 158K |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE Pulp and Paper ALBANY, GA | ALBANY, GA | 141K |
| Procter & Gamble Paper Products Pulp and Paper Bear River City, UT | Bear River City, UT | 53K |
| GILLETTE CO Other BOSTON, MA | BOSTON, MA | 44K |
| Procter & Gamble Mason Business Center Other Mason, OH | Mason, OH | 23K |
| Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. Chemicals Pineville, LA | Pineville, LA | 20K |
Where The Procter & Gamble's reported CO₂e sits by state
43.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Pennsylvania (1 site) ; next is California at 17.3% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
The Procter & Gamble reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
The Procter & Gamble's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Pulp and Paper is 94.5% of this parent's facility CO₂e (6 sites) ; Other follows at 4.2% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
The Procter & Gamble reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.6M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.6M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (9 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (177K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using The Procter & Gamble's emissions profile
- The Procter & Gamble runs high-intensity per facility (177K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #245 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.