EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

The Williams Cos - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 65 facilities across 16 states (6.2M MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
6.2M
Reporting facilities
65
States covered
16
Overall rank
#86
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

6.2M MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, The Williams Cos reported 6.2M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 65 facilities in 16 states (ranks among the top 5% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#86 of 2,289)) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #86 of 2,289
  • #10 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +3.0% since 2011

The Williams Cos vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

6,150,275 86th of 2289 higher than 2,203 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How The Williams Cos spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (23 facilities, 2.84M MT).

Median split: 23 facilities, 2.84M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 20 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M2M4M6M8M10M12M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 23 facilities, 2.84M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: The Williams Cos.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: The Williams Cos, 65 facilities, 6.15M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent the-williams-cos · 2023 #86 · 6.2M MT

CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-FLEET · SPAN-NATION · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MID 6.2M MT
  • TOP-DECILE #86/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Alliant Energy · Power Plants
  • FAC-FLEET 65 facilities
  • SPAN-NATION 16 states
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-FLAT +3% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Alliant Energy · Power Plants (±2K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for The Williams Cos: CH₄ is 5.7% of 6.2M MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 5.8%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
94.2%
5.8M MT
CH₄
5.7%
353K MT
N₂O
0%
3K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around The Williams Cos

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MUns Energy · Power Plants · …6.2MThe Williams Cos · Petroleum…6.2MAlliant Energy · Power Plant…6.1MAramco Services · Petroleum …6.1MEastman Chemical · Chemicals…6.1MPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around The Williams Cos · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

The Williams Cos - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Converse Central Facility416KNorth DeSoto Central Facility398KEcho Springs Gas Plant382KWILLOW CREEK GAS PLANT292KGULFSTREAM STATION 410 (a.k.…254KBARGATH, INC.- PARACHUTE215KOpal Gas Plant207KTRANSCO STATION 90184K

The Williams Cos's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

High-emitter reporting timeline

The Williams Cos - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
6.2M MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
4.5M5M5.5M6M6.5M 2011201320152017201920212023 6.15M

The Williams Cos annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

The Williams Cos reported 6.2M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 6.0M MT in 2011 - a rise of 3.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Wide facility book (65)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Converse Central Facility
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Mansfield, LA
416K
North DeSoto Central Facility
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Frierson, LA
398K
Echo Springs Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Wamsutter, WY
382K
WILLOW CREEK GAS PLANT
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Rifle, CO
292K
GULFSTREAM STATION 410 (a.k.a. STATION 100)
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
CODEN, AL
254K
BARGATH, INC.- PARACHUTE
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
PARACHUTE, 3.4 MI NW OF, CO
215K
Opal Gas Plant
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
OPAL, WY
207K
TRANSCO STATION 90
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
SWEETWATER, AL
184K
TRANSCO STATION 165/166
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
CHATHAM, VA
150K
Springridge South Compressor Station
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Keatchie, LA
142K
WILLIAMS MOBILE BAY GAS PROCESSING FACILITY
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
CODEN, AL
136K
DISCOVERY PRODUCER SERVICES LLC - DISCOVERY PARADIS FRACTIONATION PLANT
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
PARADIS, LA
133K
TRANSCO STATION 517
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Benton, PA
126K
TRANSCO STATION 607
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Sweet Valley, PA
125K
TRANSCO STATION 110
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
WADLEY, AL
117K
MountainWest Pipeline - Rock Springs Station (Tran)
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
ROCK SPRINGS, WY
113K
OMAHA CDP
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
DEBERRY, TX
110K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP SUMAS C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
SUMAS, WA
105K
Moundsville Fractionation Plant
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
Moundsville, WV
104K
TRANSCO STATION 180
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
UNIONVILLE, VA
103K
TRANSCO STATION 515
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
BEAR CREEK, PA
99K
TRANSCO STATION 190
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
ELLICOTT CITY, MD
98K
TRANSCO STATION 170
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
APPOMATTOX, VA
97K
TRANSCO STATION 042
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Starks, LA
95K
Harrison Hub Fractionation Plant
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
Scio, OH
93K
Oak Grove Plant
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
Moundsville, WV
92K
TRANSCO STATION 44
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Johnson's Bayou, LA
91K
TRANSCO STATION 80
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
HEIDELBERG, MS
90K
TRANSCO STATION 620
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Hegins, PA
88K
TRANSCO STATION 120
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
STOCKBRIDGE, GA
87K
TRANSCO STATION 610
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Millville, PA
82K
MARKHAM GAS PROCESSING PLANT
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
MARKHAM, TX
80K
TRANSCO STATION 105
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
ROCKFORD, AL
78K
FORT BEELER GAS PLANT
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Cameron, WV
75K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP MT. VERNON
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Mt. Vernon, WA
74K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP - SNOHOMISH C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Snohomish, WA
70K
TRANSCO STATION 130
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
COMER, GA
65K
TRANSCO STATION 60
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
JACKSON, LA
62K
TRANSCO STATION 85
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Butler, AL
58K
TRANSCO STATION 160
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
REIDSVILLE, NC
53K
TRANSCO STATION 54
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
WASHINGTON, LA
52K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP SUMNER C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Sumner, WA
51K
GULFSTREAM STATION 420
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
PALMETTO, FL
51K
Kensington Cryogenic Processing Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Kensington, OH
51K
TRANSCO STATION 70
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
TYLERTOWN, MS
49K
TRANSCO STATION 95
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Marion Junction, AL
45K
TRANSCO STATION 150
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
MOORESVILLE, NC
42K
EAST LAKE TREATING FACILITY
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
RINGGOLD, LA
39K
Dilley Treating Facility
Injection of CO2
Cotulla, TX
38K
TRANSCO STATION 116
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Whitesburg, GA
34K
TRANSCO STATION 084
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Bulter, AL
33K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP - MUDDY CREEK C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Kemmerer, WY
30K
TRANSCO STATION 125
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Monroe, GA
30K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP GREEN RIVER C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Green River, WY
27K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP GOLDENDALE C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Goldendale, WA
21K
TRANSCO STATION 100
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
BILLINGSLEY, AL
21K
TRANSCO STATION 140
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
MOORE, SC
18K
Jackson Prairie Natural Gas Storage
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Chehalis, WA
15K
TRANSCO STATION 30
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
El Campo, TX
13K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP ROOSEVELT C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Bickleton, WA
11K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP WASHOUGAL C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Washougal, WA
11K
TRANSCO STATION 83
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Citronelle, AL
10K
NORTHWEST PIPELINE GP WILLARD C/S
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Cook, WA
9K
TRANSCO STATION 023
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Victoria, TX
9K
TRANSCO STATION 45
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Ragley, LA
4K

Where The Williams Cos's reported CO₂e sits by state

23.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Louisiana (10 sites) ; next is Alabama at 15.2% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

LA1.4MAL935KWY758KPA520KCO508KWA367KVA350KWV271K
EPA GHGRP · The Williams Cos facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

The Williams Cos reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

The Williams Cos's reported CO₂e by EPA sector

Top sector Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems is 89.2% of this parent's facility CO₂e (59 sites) ; Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers follows at 10.2% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Sy…5.5MNatural Gas and Natural Gas …629KInjection of CO238K
EPA GHGRP · The Williams Cos facility CO₂e by sector · May 2026

The Williams Cos reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (6.2M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using The Williams Cos's emissions profile

  • The Williams Cos runs mid-intensity per facility (95K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #86 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.