EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Metals
Toyota Tsusho America - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 3 states (1.9M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.9M
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #229
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Toyota Tsusho America reported 1.9M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 3 states (ranks #229 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 7272% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #229 of 2,289
- #7 in Metals
- +7272.0% since 2013
Toyota Tsusho America vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,866,799 229th of 2289 higher than 2,060 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Toyota Tsusho America spreads its footprint vs Metals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Metals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (3 facilities, 0.84M MT).
You are here: Toyota Tsusho America.
Metals peer footprint table: Toyota Tsusho America, 3 facilities, 1.87M MT CO2e. Cleveland-Cliffs, 26 facilities, 27.37M MT CO2e. US Steel, 13 facilities, 19.41M MT CO2e. Nucor, 24 facilities, 5.57M MT CO2e. Alcoa, 3 facilities, 5.16M MT CO2e. Suncoke Energy, 5 facilities, 3.27M MT CO2e. Steel Dynamics, 10 facilities, 2.54M MT CO2e. Century Aluminum, 3 facilities, 0.99M MT CO2e. Globe Specialty Metals, 4 facilities, 0.92M MT CO2e. Commercial Metals, 8 facilities, 0.86M MT CO2e. Gerdau USA, 9 facilities, 0.84M MT CO2e. Gramercy Holdings I, 1 facilities, 0.8M MT CO2e. Ssab US Holding, 2 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Novelis, 6 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arconic, 4 facilities, 0.63M MT CO2e. Arcelormittal Holdings, 2 facilities, 0.62M MT CO2e. Am/ns Calvert, 1 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Bluescope Steel Investments, 1 facilities, 0.44M MT CO2e. Pinnacle Mountain Holding Co III, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Proterial America, 2 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e. Magnitude 7 Metals, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent toyota-tsusho-america · 2023 #229 · 1.9M MT
CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-METALS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.9M MT
- TOP-DECILE #229/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Tyson Foods · Other
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-METALS Metals
- TREND-SURGE +7272% since 2013
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Tyson Foods · Other (±8K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 1.9M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 1.9M MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 865 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 1K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Toyota Tsusho America
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Toyota Tsusho America - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Toyota Tsusho America's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Toyota Tsusho America - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2013–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.9M MT
- 11 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Toyota Tsusho America annual reported GHG emissions, 2013–2023
Toyota Tsusho America reported 1.9M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 25K MT in 2013 - a rise of 7272.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| St. Joseph Energy Center LLC Power Plants New Carlisle, IN | New Carlisle, IN | 1.8M |
| MOST INC Metals TROY, MO | TROY, MO | 27K |
| MOST, INC Metals Jackson, TN | Jackson, TN | 22K |
Where Toyota Tsusho America's reported CO₂e sits by state
97.4% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Indiana (1 site) ; next is Missouri at 1.4% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Toyota Tsusho America reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Toyota Tsusho America's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Power Plants is 97.4% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Metals follows at 2.6% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Toyota Tsusho America reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.9M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.9M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (622K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Toyota Tsusho America's emissions profile
- Toyota Tsusho America runs high-intensity per facility (622K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Metals sector on the Metals industry page.
- It ranks #229 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Metals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.