EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Pulp and Paper

Up Paper - declining reported GHG

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 1 reporting facility in 1 state.

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
52K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#1501
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

52K MT CO₂e · 2023

Up Paper reported emissions fell 70.0% since 2011 to 52K MT CO₂e in 2023.

  • Overall rank #1501 of 2,289
  • #44 in Pulp and Paper
  • -70.0% since 2011

Up Paper vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

52,135 1501st of 2289 higher than 788 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Up Paper spreads its footprint vs Pulp and Paper peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Pulp and Paper companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (4 facilities, 0.65M MT).

Median split: 4 facilities, 0.65M MT CO₂e among Pulp and Paper peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 0102030 0M2M4M6M8M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Pulp and Paper
Median split: 4 facilities, 0.65M MT CO₂e among Pulp and Paper peers.

You are here: Up Paper.

Pulp and Paper peer footprint table: Up Paper, 1 facilities, 0.05M MT CO2e. Koch Industries, 20 facilities, 6.32M MT CO2e. Westrock, 24 facilities, 5.74M MT CO2e. International Paper, 21 facilities, 5.08M MT CO2e. Graphic Packaging Holding, 6 facilities, 1.52M MT CO2e. The Procter & Gamble, 6 facilities, 1.51M MT CO2e. Packaging CORP of America, 8 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Domtar, 7 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Kimberly-Clark, 8 facilities, 1.03M MT CO2e. Nd Paper, 4 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Billerud Americas, 3 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Clearwater Paper, 4 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Ahlstrom-Munksjo North America Specialty Solutions, 4 facilities, 0.59M MT CO2e. Sappi North America, 3 facilities, 0.52M MT CO2e. Pratt Industries, 5 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Sylvamo North America, 2 facilities, 0.49M MT CO2e. New-Indy Jv, 2 facilities, 0.47M MT CO2e. Hig Capital, 1 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. Pixelle Specialty Solutions, 3 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. Evergreen Packaging Group Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.4M MT CO2e. Nippon Paper Industries CO, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent up-paper · 2023 #1501 · 52K MT

CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-THIN 52K MT
  • MID-PACK #1501/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Pentwater Capital Man… · Metals
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP Pulp and Paper
  • TREND-CUT −70% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Pentwater Capital Management · Metals (±5 MT)

Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 52K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
52K MT
CH₄
0%
25 MT
N₂O
0.1%
29 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Up Paper

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MCity & County of Hono… · Was…52KSyngenta · Chemicals · near52KPentwater Capital Man… · Met…52KUp Paper · Pulp and Pa… · th…52KNorth Central Iowa Re… · Was…52KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Up Paper · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Up Paper - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
52K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.05M0.1M0.15M0.2M0.25M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.05M

Up Paper annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Up Paper reported 52K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 174K MT in 2011 - a decline of 70.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
UP Paper LLC
Pulp and Paper
MANISTIQUE, MI
52K

Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles

Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Up Paper. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Pulp and Paper browse pages.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Up Paper's emissions profile

  • Up Paper runs mid-intensity per facility (52K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Pulp and Paper sector on the Pulp and Paper industry page.
  • It ranks #1501 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Pulp and Paper emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.