EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
Cordia - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 6 facilities across 4 states (313K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 313K
- Reporting facilities
- 6
- States covered
- 4
- Overall rank
- #599
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Cordia reported 313K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 6 facilities in 4 states (ranks #599 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 12% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #599 of 2,289
- #265 in Power Plants
- +11.6% since 2011
Cordia vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
312,535 599th of 2289 higher than 1,690 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Cordia spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).
You are here: Cordia.
Power Plants peer footprint table: Cordia, 6 facilities, 0.31M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent cordia · 2023 #599 · 313K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 313K MT
- MID-PACK #599/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Pioneer Natural Resou… · Petroleum and…
- FAC-PAIR 6 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 4 states
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-UP +12% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Pioneer Natural Resources · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (±447 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 313K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 312K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 147 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 176 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Cordia
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Cordia - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Cordia's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Cordia - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 313K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Cordia annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Cordia reported 313K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 280K MT in 2011 - a rise of 11.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (6)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| ENERGY CENTER MINNEAPOLIS Power Plants MINNEAPOLIS, MN | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 87K |
| Energy Center Omaha, LLC Other OMAHA, NE | OMAHA, NE | 69K |
| ENERGY CENTER SAN FRANCISCO Power Plants SAN FRANCISCO, CA | SAN FRANCISCO, CA | 59K |
| Energy Center Pittsburgh LLC Power Plants Pittsburgh, PA | Pittsburgh, PA | 36K |
| Energy Center Pittsburgh LLC - Gibbon Plant Power Plants Pittsburgh, PA | Pittsburgh, PA | 34K |
| Energy Center Harrisburg LLC Power Plants Harrisburg, PA | Harrisburg, PA | 26K |
Where Cordia's reported CO₂e sits by state
30.9% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Pennsylvania (3 sites) ; next is Minnesota at 27.9% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Cordia reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Cordia's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Power Plants is 77.8% of this parent's facility CO₂e (5 sites) ; Other follows at 22.2% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Cordia reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (313K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (313K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (6 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (52K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Cordia's emissions profile
- Cordia runs mid-intensity per facility (52K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #599 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.