EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

Western Midstream Partners - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 9 facilities across 4 states (1.0M MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
1.0M
Reporting facilities
9
States covered
4
Overall rank
#338
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

1.0M MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Western Midstream Partners reported 1.0M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 9 facilities in 4 states (ranks #338 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 329% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #338 of 2,289
  • #24 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
  • +329.0% since 2011

Western Midstream Partners vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

1,005,731 338th of 2289 higher than 1,951 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Western Midstream Partners spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 050100150200 0M2M4M6M8M10M12M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Median split: 21 facilities, 2.77M MT CO₂e among Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers.

You are here: Western Midstream Partners.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Western Midstream Partners, 9 facilities, 1.01M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent western-midstream-partners · 2023 #338 · 1.0M MT

CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MID 1.0M MT
  • UPPER-Q #338/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH 3M · Minerals
  • FAC-MULTI 9 facilities
  • SPAN-MULTI 4 states
  • SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
  • TREND-SURGE +329% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: 3M · Minerals (±1K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 methane-weighted parent mix

Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Western Midstream Partners: CH₄ is 2.8% of 1.0M MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 2.9%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
97.1%
977K MT
CH₄
2.8%
28K MT
N₂O
0%
465 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Western Midstream Partners

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MKleen Energy Systems · Power…1.0MBridgeport Energy · Power Pl…1.0M3M · Minerals · near1.0MWestern Midstream Par… · Pet…1.0MMethanex USA · Chemicals · n…1.0MPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Western Midstream Partners · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Western Midstream Partners - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Fort Lupton Compressor Stati…338KRamsey Gas Plant273KLatham Gas Plant81KMentone Gas Plant79KBrasada Gas Plant70KHilight-Reno Junction Gas Pl…58KWattenberg Gas Plant50KBones Springs Plant38K

Western Midstream Partners's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Western Midstream Partners - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
1.0M MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.2M0.4M0.6M0.8M1M1.2M 2011201320152017201920212023 1.01M

Western Midstream Partners annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Western Midstream Partners reported 1.0M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 234K MT in 2011 - a rise of 329.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (9)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Fort Lupton Compressor Station
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
Brighton, CO
338K
Ramsey Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Orla, TX
273K
Latham Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Platteville, CO
81K
Mentone Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Mentone, TX
79K
Brasada Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Cotulla, TX
70K
Hilight-Reno Junction Gas Plant
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
Gillette, WY
58K
Wattenberg Gas Plant
Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers
Aurora, CO
50K
Bones Springs Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Barstow, TX
38K
Chipeta Gas Plant
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Vernal, UT
18K

Where Western Midstream Partners's reported CO₂e sits by state

46.6% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Colorado (3 sites) ; next is Texas at 45.8% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

CO468KTX461KWY58KUT18K
EPA GHGRP · Western Midstream Partners facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Western Midstream Partners reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Western Midstream Partners's reported CO₂e by EPA sector

Top sector Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems is 55.7% of this parent's facility CO₂e (6 sites) ; Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers follows at 44.3% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.

Petroleum and Natural Gas Sy…560KNatural Gas and Natural Gas …446K
EPA GHGRP · Western Midstream Partners facility CO₂e by sector · May 2026

Western Midstream Partners reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.0M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Western Midstream Partners's emissions profile

  • Western Midstream Partners runs mid-intensity per facility (112K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
  • It ranks #338 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.