EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Hess - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 5 facilities across 2 states (481K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 481K
- Reporting facilities
- 5
- States covered
- 2
- Overall rank
- #480
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Hess reported 481K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 5 facilities in 2 states (ranks #480 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 89% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #480 of 2,289
- #36 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +89.4% since 2011
Hess vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
480,771 480th of 2289 higher than 1,809 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Hess spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Hess.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Hess, 5 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent hess · 2023 #480 · 481K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 481K MT
- UPPER-Q #480/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH South Texas Electric… · Power Plants
- FAC-PAIR 5 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 2 states
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-SURGE +89% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: South Texas Electric Cooperative · Power Plants (±2K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Hess: CH₄ is 4.1% of 481K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.1%). Non-CO₂ gases total 4.2%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 95.8%
- 461K MT
- CH₄
- 4.1%
- 20K MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 310 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Hess
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Hess - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Hess's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Hess - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 481K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Hess annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Hess reported 481K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 254K MT in 2011 - a rise of 89.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (5)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| TIOGA GAS PROCESSING PLANT Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers TIOGA, ND | TIOGA, ND | 242K |
| Green Canyon 468 A (Stampede) Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Offshore, LA | Offshore, LA | 141K |
| Mississippi Canyon 724 Gulfstar 1 (Tubular Bells) Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Offshore, LA | Offshore, LA | 78K |
| Garden Banks 260 A Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Offshore, LA | Offshore, LA | 16K |
| SEA ROBIN GAS PROCESSING PLANT Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems ERATH, LA | ERATH, LA | 4K |
Where Hess's reported CO₂e sits by state
50.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in North Dakota (1 site) ; next is Louisiana at 49.7% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Hess reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Hess's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Suppliers is 50.3% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems follows at 49.7% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Hess reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (481K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (481K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (5 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (96K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Hess's emissions profile
- Hess runs mid-intensity per facility (96K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #480 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.