EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals

Pilkington Holdings - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 3 states (482K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
482K
Reporting facilities
3
States covered
3
Overall rank
#479
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

482K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Pilkington Holdings reported 482K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 3 states (ranks #479 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions remained broadly stable over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #479 of 2,289
  • #48 in Minerals
  • -2.7% since 2011

Pilkington Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

482,444 479th of 2289 higher than 1,810 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Pilkington Holdings spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).

Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 051015 0M5M10M15M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Minerals
Median split: 5 facilities, 3.57M MT CO₂e among Minerals peers.

You are here: Pilkington Holdings.

Minerals peer footprint table: Pilkington Holdings, 3 facilities, 0.48M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent pilkington-holdings · 2023 #479 · 482K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 482K MT
  • UPPER-Q #479/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH City of Dallas Texas · Waste
  • FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 3 states
  • SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
  • TREND-FLAT −3% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: City of Dallas Texas · Waste (±354 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 482K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
482K MT
CH₄
0%
176 MT
N₂O
0%
212 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Pilkington Holdings

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MDrake Cement · Minerals · ne…483KCity of Dallas Texas · Waste…483KPilkington Holdings · Minera…482KHess · Petroleum a… · near481KSouth Texas Electric… · Powe…479KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Pilkington Holdings · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Pilkington Holdings - top sites (MT CO₂e)

PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA, IN…201KPilkington North America, In…187KPILKINGTON N.A.95K

Pilkington Holdings's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

High-emitter reporting timeline

Pilkington Holdings - high-emitter annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
482K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.4M0.45M0.5M0.55M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.48M

Pilkington Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Pilkington Holdings reported 482K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 496K MT in 2011 - a decline of 2.7% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (3)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
PILKINGTON NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Minerals
LAURINBURG, NC
201K
Pilkington North America, Inc.
Minerals
ROSSFORD, OH
187K
PILKINGTON N.A.
Minerals
OTTAWA, IL
95K

Where Pilkington Holdings's reported CO₂e sits by state

41.7% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in North Carolina (1 site) ; next is Ohio at 38.7% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

NC201KOH187KIL95K
EPA GHGRP · Pilkington Holdings facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Pilkington Holdings reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (482K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Similar reported CO₂e

Nearest parent totals (482K MT here).

Similar facility book

Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).

Similar per-facility CO₂e

Nearest average MT per facility (161K MT here).

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Pilkington Holdings's emissions profile

  • Pilkington Holdings runs high-intensity per facility (161K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
  • It ranks #479 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.