EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Imperial Irrigation District - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 2 facilities across 1 state (556K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
556K
Reporting facilities
2
States covered
1
Overall rank
#448
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

556K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Imperial Irrigation District reported 556K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 2 facilities in 1 state (ranks #448 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 28% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #448 of 2,289
  • #228 in Power Plants
  • +28.4% since 2011

Imperial Irrigation District vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

556,458 448th of 2289 higher than 1,841 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Imperial Irrigation District spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Imperial Irrigation District.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Imperial Irrigation District, 2 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent imperial-irrigation-district · 2023 #448 · 556K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 556K MT
  • UPPER-Q #448/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Navitas Midstream Par… · Petroleum and…
  • FAC-PAIR 2 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-SURGE +28% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Navitas Midstream Partners · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (±4K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 556K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
556K MT
CH₄
0%
258 MT
N₂O
0.1%
307 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Imperial Irrigation District

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MAm/ns Calvert · Metals · near564KState of California · Other …564KOaktree Capital Group · Petr…564KNavitas Midstream Par… · Pet…560KImperial Irrigation D… · Pow…556KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Imperial Irrigation District · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Imperial Irrigation District - top sites (MT CO₂e)

El Centro510KNiland Gas Turbine Plant46K

Imperial Irrigation District's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

Imperial Irrigation District - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
556K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.3M0.4M0.5M0.6M0.7M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.56M

Imperial Irrigation District annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Imperial Irrigation District reported 556K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 433K MT in 2011 - a rise of 28.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (2)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
El Centro
Power Plants
EL CENTRO, CA
510K
Niland Gas Turbine Plant
Power Plants
NILAND, CA
46K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (556K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Imperial Irrigation District's emissions profile

  • Imperial Irrigation District runs high-intensity per facility (278K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #448 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.