EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Other
State of California - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 8 facilities across 1 state (564K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 564K
- Reporting facilities
- 8
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #445
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, State of California reported 564K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 8 facilities in 1 state (ranks #445 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 36% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #445 of 2,289
- #44 in Other
- +36.4% since 2011
State of California vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
564,000 445th of 2289 higher than 1,844 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How State of California spreads its footprint vs Other peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Other companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 2.28M MT).
You are here: State of California.
Other peer footprint table: State of California, 8 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Prairie State Energy Campus Management, 1 facilities, 11.46M MT CO2e. Marathon Petroleum, 4 facilities, 7.11M MT CO2e. Archer Daniels Midland, 15 facilities, 6.67M MT CO2e. Consol Energy, 4 facilities, 6.53M MT CO2e. American Consolidated Natural Resources, 6 facilities, 6.29M MT CO2e. Hummel Station, 1 facilities, 2.91M MT CO2e. Arch Resources, 5 facilities, 2.83M MT CO2e. US Government, 51 facilities, 2.78M MT CO2e. Poet, 28 facilities, 2.66M MT CO2e. Cargill, 27 facilities, 2.51M MT CO2e. Alliance Holdings Gp, 5 facilities, 2.28M MT CO2e. Valero Energy, 12 facilities, 2.24M MT CO2e. Tyson Foods, 31 facilities, 1.72M MT CO2e. Iron Senergy Holding, 1 facilities, 1.64M MT CO2e. Karnavati Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. Hatfield Metallurgical Intermediate Holdings, 1 facilities, 1.38M MT CO2e. Alpha Metallurgical Resources, 9 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e. Hallador Energy, 2 facilities, 1.32M MT CO2e. Green Plains, 11 facilities, 1.3M MT CO2e. Coronado Group, 3 facilities, 1.28M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent state-of-california · 2023 #445 · 564K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-OTHER · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 564K MT
- UPPER-Q #445/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Oaktree Capital Group · Petroleum and…
- FAC-MULTI 8 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-OTHER Other
- TREND-SURGE +36% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Oaktree Capital Group · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems (±22 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 564K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 563K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 265 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 316 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around State of California
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
State of California - top sites (MT CO₂e)
State of California's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
State of California - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 564K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
State of California annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
State of California reported 564K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 413K MT in 2011 - a rise of 36.4% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (8)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Other LA JOLLA, CA | LA JOLLA, CA | 161K |
| UC Berkeley Other Berkeley, CA | Berkeley, CA | 122K |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Other IRVINE, CA | IRVINE, CA | 64K |
| UC DAVIS MEDICAL CENTER Other SACRAMENTO, CA | SACRAMENTO, CA | 58K |
| University of California, San Francisco - Parnassus Campus Other San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, CA | 52K |
| San Diego State University Other San Diego, CA | San Diego, CA | 51K |
| University of California Santa Cruz Other SANTA CRUZ, CA | SANTA CRUZ, CA | 29K |
| CSU, San Jose State University Other San Jose, CA | San Jose, CA | 27K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (564K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (564K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (8 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (71K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using State of California's emissions profile
- State of California runs mid-intensity per facility (71K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Other sector on the Other industry page.
- It ranks #445 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Other emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.