EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Oaktree Capital Group - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 6 facilities across 1 state (564K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 564K
- Reporting facilities
- 6
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #446
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Oaktree Capital Group reported 564K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 6 facilities in 1 state (ranks #446 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 55% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #446 of 2,289
- #30 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- -55.0% since 2011
Oaktree Capital Group vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
563,978 446th of 2289 higher than 1,843 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Oaktree Capital Group spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Oaktree Capital Group.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Oaktree Capital Group, 6 facilities, 0.56M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent oaktree-capital-group · 2023 #446 · 564K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 564K MT
- UPPER-Q #446/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH State of California · Other
- FAC-PAIR 6 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-CUT −55% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: State of California · Other (±22 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 564K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 563K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 266 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 317 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Oaktree Capital Group
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Oaktree Capital Group - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Oaktree Capital Group's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Oaktree Capital Group - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 564K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Oaktree Capital Group annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Oaktree Capital Group reported 564K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 1.3M MT in 2011 - a decline of 55.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (6)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Aera Energy Coalinga Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Coalinga, CA | Coalinga, CA | 155K |
| Aera Energy Lost Hills Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems McKittrick, CA | McKittrick, CA | 148K |
| Aera Energy MOCO Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Maricopa, CA | Maricopa, CA | 93K |
| Aera Energy Alberta Finley Shale Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Fellows, CA | Fellows, CA | 77K |
| Aera Energy 25 Hill Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Maricopa, CA | Maricopa, CA | 46K |
| Aera Energy Calso Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems McKittrick, CA | McKittrick, CA | 45K |
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (564K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (564K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (6 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (94K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Oaktree Capital Group's emissions profile
- Oaktree Capital Group runs mid-intensity per facility (94K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #446 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.