EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Lhoist North America - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 10 facilities across 7 states (5.5M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 5.5M
- Reporting facilities
- 10
- States covered
- 7
- Overall rank
- #99
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Lhoist North America reported 5.5M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 10 facilities in 7 states (ranks among the top 5% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#99 of 2,289)) Emissions decreased 7% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #99 of 2,289
- #6 in Minerals
- -7.5% since 2011
Lhoist North America vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
5,453,861 99th of 2289 higher than 2,190 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Lhoist North America spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.71M MT).
You are here: Lhoist North America.
Minerals peer footprint table: Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent lhoist-north-america · 2023 #99 · 5.5M MT
CO2E-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 5.5M MT
- TOP-DECILE #99/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Alcoa · Metals
- FAC-MULTI 10 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 7 states
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-DOWN −8% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Alcoa · Metals (±33K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 5.5M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 5.5M MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 1K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 2K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Lhoist North America
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Lhoist North America - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Lhoist North America's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
Lhoist North America - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 5.5M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Lhoist North America annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Lhoist North America reported 5.5M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 5.9M MT in 2011 - a decline of 7.5% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Wide facility book (10)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Lhoist North America - MONTEVALLO PLANT Minerals CALERA, AL | CALERA, AL | 976K |
| LHOIST NORTH AMERICA Minerals SAINTE GENEVIEVE, MO | SAINTE GENEVIEVE, MO | 846K |
| LHOIST NORTH AMERICA Minerals PEACH SPRINGS, AZ | PEACH SPRINGS, AZ | 787K |
| LHOIST NORTH AMERICA OF ALABAMA LLC O'NEAL PLANT Minerals CALERA, AL | CALERA, AL | 600K |
| Lhoist North America APEX PLANT Minerals LAS VEGAS, NV | LAS VEGAS, NV | 586K |
| Lhoist North America New Braunfels Plant Minerals NEW BRAUNFELS, TX | NEW BRAUNFELS, TX | 580K |
| Lhoist North America /Clifton Plant Minerals CLIFTON, TX | CLIFTON, TX | 453K |
| LHOIST NORTH AMERICA - MARBLE FALLS PLANT Minerals BURNET, TX | BURNET, TX | 376K |
| LHOIST NORTH AMERICA OF VIRGINIA INC Minerals RIPPLEMEAD, VA | RIPPLEMEAD, VA | 247K |
| LHOIST NORTH AMERICA - NATIVIDAD PLANT Minerals SALINAS, CA | SALINAS, CA | 3K |
Where Lhoist North America's reported CO₂e sits by state
28.9% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Alabama (2 sites) ; next is Texas at 25.8% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Lhoist North America reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (5.5M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (5.5M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (10 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (545K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Lhoist North America's emissions profile
- Lhoist North America runs high-intensity per facility (545K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #99 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.