EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
Msip-Sscc Holdings - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 5 reporting facilities in 3 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 142K
- Reporting facilities
- 5
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #886
Data updated May 2026
Msip-Sscc Holdings averages 28K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 142K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #886 of 2,289
- #67 in Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems
- +27.2% since 2011
Msip-Sscc Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
141,862 886th of 2289 higher than 1,403 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Msip-Sscc Holdings spreads its footprint vs Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 2.77M MT).
You are here: Msip-Sscc Holdings.
Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems peer footprint table: Msip-Sscc Holdings, 5 facilities, 0.14M MT CO2e. Cheniere Energy, 5 facilities, 9.73M MT CO2e. Energy Transfer, 129 facilities, 8.89M MT CO2e. Hilcorp Energy, 18 facilities, 8.26M MT CO2e. Kinder Morgan, 169 facilities, 8.24M MT CO2e. Enterprise Products Partners, 43 facilities, 7.79M MT CO2e. Enbridge (us), 80 facilities, 5.72M MT CO2e. The Williams Cos, 59 facilities, 5.48M MT CO2e. Transcanada Pipeline USA, 76 facilities, 4.45M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 5 facilities, 3.26M MT CO2e. Venture Global LNG, 1 facilities, 2.84M MT CO2e. Sempra Energy, 5 facilities, 2.77M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 56 facilities, 2.3M MT CO2e. Targa Resources, 21 facilities, 2.22M MT CO2e. GIP Pilot Acquisition Partners, 26 facilities, 2.08M MT CO2e. Loews, 41 facilities, 1.94M MT CO2e. Occidental Petroleum, 19 facilities, 1.55M MT CO2e. Enlink Midstream, 11 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Oneok, 23 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Ecoelectrica, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e. IKAV Impact USA, 4 facilities, 1.35M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent msip-sscc-holdings · 2023 #886 · 142K MT
CO2E-MODEST · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 142K MT
- MID-PACK #886/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Thiele Kaolin · Other
- FAC-PAIR 5 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-PETROLEUM-AN Petroleum and Nat…
- TREND-SURGE +27% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Thiele Kaolin · Other (±44 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Msip-Sscc Holdings: CH₄ is 29.4% of 142K MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0%). Non-CO₂ gases total 29.4%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 70.6%
- 100K MT
- CH₄
- 29.4%
- 42K MT
- N₂O
- 0%
- 56 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Msip-Sscc Holdings
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Msip-Sscc Holdings - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Msip-Sscc Holdings's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
Msip-Sscc Holdings - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 142K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Msip-Sscc Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Msip-Sscc Holdings reported 142K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 112K MT in 2011 - a rise of 27.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (5)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Southern Star -Hugoton Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Santanta, KS | Santanta, KS | 47K |
| Southern Star-Blackwell Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Blackwell, OK | Blackwell, OK | 35K |
| Southern Star-Grabham Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Independence, KS | Independence, KS | 31K |
| Southern Star-Montezuma Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Montezuma, KS | Montezuma, KS | 17K |
| Southern Star-Saginaw Compressor Station Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Joplin, MO | Joplin, MO | 12K |
Where Msip-Sscc Holdings's reported CO₂e sits by state
67.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Kansas (3 sites) ; next is Oklahoma at 24.4% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Msip-Sscc Holdings reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Msip-Sscc Holdings. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (142K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (5 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (28K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Msip-Sscc Holdings's emissions profile
- Msip-Sscc Holdings runs low-intensity per facility (28K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems sector on the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems industry page.
- It ranks #886 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.