EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Potters Intermediate Holdings - per-facility CO₂e intensity
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), Scope 1 emissions reported across 3 reporting facilities in 3 states.
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 85K
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #1165
Data updated May 2026
Potters Intermediate Holdings averages 28K MT CO₂e per reporting facility (low-intensity NTILE) on 85K MT total in 2023.
- Overall rank #1165 of 2,289
- #74 in Minerals
- +1.0% since 2011
Potters Intermediate Holdings vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
85,180 1165th of 2289 higher than 1,124 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Potters Intermediate Holdings spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).
You are here: Potters Intermediate Holdings.
Minerals peer footprint table: Potters Intermediate Holdings, 3 facilities, 0.09M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent potters-intermediate-holdings · 2023 #1165 · 85K MT
CO2E-THIN · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-THIN 85K MT
- MID-PACK #1165/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Leggett & Platt · Metals
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-FLAT +1% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Leggett & Platt · Metals (±131 MT)
Instrument codes from this parent’s EPA GHGRP rollup: CO₂e band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend, and book completeness. Not an EPA grade or compliance rating.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 85K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 85K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 40 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 48 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Potters Intermediate Holdings
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest facilities by reported emissions
Potters Intermediate Holdings - top facilities (MT CO₂e)
Potters Intermediate Holdings's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Reported emissions over time
Potters Intermediate Holdings - annual reported GHG emissions
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 85K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Potters Intermediate Holdings annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Potters Intermediate Holdings reported 85K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 84K MT in 2011 - a rise of 1.0% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
How Potters Intermediate Holdings's 85K MT CO₂e total splits across its reporting facilities.
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Potters Industries LLC. - Apex, NC Minerals Apex, NC | Apex, NC | 33K |
| Potters Industries, Inc. - Muscatine, IA Minerals Muscatine, IA | Muscatine, IA | 28K |
| Potters Industries, Inc. - Brownwood, TX Minerals BROWNWOOD, TX | BROWNWOOD, TX | 25K |
Where Potters Intermediate Holdings's reported CO₂e sits by state
38.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in North Carolina (1 site) ; next is Iowa at 32.3% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Potters Intermediate Holdings reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide parents with similar GHGRP profiles
Three EPA GHGRP-derived peer sets for Potters Intermediate Holdings. The CO₂e neighbourhood chart above shows poles; these links are navigable comparison paths beyond Minerals browse pages.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (85K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (28K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Potters Intermediate Holdings's emissions profile
- Potters Intermediate Holdings runs low-intensity per facility (28K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #1165 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.