EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Nautilus Power - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 2 states (361K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
361K
Reporting facilities
3
States covered
2
Overall rank
#553
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

361K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Nautilus Power reported 361K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 2 states (ranks #553 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 22% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #553 of 2,289
  • #255 in Power Plants
  • -22.3% since 2011

Nautilus Power vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

361,110 553rd of 2289 higher than 1,736 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Nautilus Power spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Nautilus Power.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Nautilus Power, 3 facilities, 0.36M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent nautilus-power · 2023 #553 · 361K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 361K MT
  • UPPER-Q #553/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ergon · Chemicals
  • FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
  • SPAN-PAIR 2 states
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-DOWN −22% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Ergon · Chemicals (±30 MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 361K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
361K MT
CH₄
0%
168 MT
N₂O
0.1%
202 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Nautilus Power

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MUniversity of Texas S… · Pow…364KSeeit District Energy · Powe…363KNautilus Power · Power Plant…361KErgon · Chemicals · near361KCemex Southeast · Minerals ·…359KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Nautilus Power · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Nautilus Power - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Ocean Peaking Power, LP132KRock Springs Generating Faci…120KLakewood Cogeneration109K

Nautilus Power's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Nautilus Power - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
361K MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0M0.5M1M1.5M 2011201320152017201920212023 0.36M

Nautilus Power annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nautilus Power reported 361K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 465K MT in 2011 - a decline of 22.3% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (3)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Ocean Peaking Power, LP
Power Plants
LAKEWOOD, NJ
132K
Rock Springs Generating Facility
Power Plants
RISING SUN, MD
120K
Lakewood Cogeneration
Power Plants
LAKEWOOD, NJ
109K

Where Nautilus Power's reported CO₂e sits by state

66.8% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in New Jersey (2 sites) ; next is Maryland at 33.2% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

NJ241KMD120K
EPA GHGRP · Nautilus Power facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

Nautilus Power reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (361K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Nautilus Power's emissions profile

  • Nautilus Power runs high-intensity per facility (120K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #553 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.