EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Seeit District Energy - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 1 facility across 1 state (363K MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
363K
Reporting facilities
1
States covered
1
Overall rank
#552
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

363K MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Seeit District Energy reported 363K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 1 facility in 1 state (ranks #552 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 56% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #552 of 2,289
  • #254 in Power Plants
  • -56.2% since 2013

Seeit District Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

363,345 552nd of 2289 higher than 1,737 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Seeit District Energy spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Seeit District Energy.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Seeit District Energy, 1 facilities, 0.36M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent seeit-district-energy · 2023 #552 · 363K MT

CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-SINGLE · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-CUT · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-MODEST 363K MT
  • UPPER-Q #552/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH University of Texas S… · Power Plants
  • FAC-SINGLE 1 facility
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-CUT −56% since 2013
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: University of Texas System · Power Plants (±1K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 363K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
363K MT
CH₄
0.1%
183 MT
N₂O
0.1%
220 MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Seeit District Energy

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MMerck & CO · Chemicals · near366KGreif · Pulp and Pa… · near365KUniversity of Texas S… · Pow…364KSeeit District Energy · Powe…363KNautilus Power · Power Plant…361KPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Seeit District Energy · May 2026

Emissions decline across reporting years

Seeit District Energy - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2013–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
363K MT
11 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
0.2M0.4M0.6M0.8M1M 20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023 0.36M

Seeit District Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2013–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Seeit District Energy reported 363K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 829K MT in 2013 - a decline of 56.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Facilities (1)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
RED-Rochester, LLC-Eastman Business Park, NY
Power Plants
ROCHESTER, NY
363K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (363K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Seeit District Energy's emissions profile

  • Seeit District Energy runs high-intensity per facility (363K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #552 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.