EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants
University of Texas System - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 1 state (364K MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 364K
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 1
- Overall rank
- #551
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, University of Texas System reported 364K MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 1 state (ranks #551 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 39% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #551 of 2,289
- #253 in Power Plants
- +38.8% since 2011
University of Texas System vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
364,436 551st of 2289 higher than 1,738 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How University of Texas System spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).
You are here: University of Texas System.
Power Plants peer footprint table: University of Texas System, 3 facilities, 0.36M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent university-of-texas-system · 2023 #551 · 364K MT
CO2E-MODEST · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MODEST 364K MT
- UPPER-Q #551/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Greif · Pulp and Paper
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-HOME 1 state
- SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
- TREND-SURGE +39% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Greif · Pulp and Paper (±635 MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book
This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 364K MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 99.9%
- 364K MT
- CH₄
- 0%
- 172 MT
- N₂O
- 0.1%
- 204 MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around University of Texas System
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
University of Texas System - top sites (MT CO₂e)
University of Texas System's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions growth across reporting years
University of Texas System - rising annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 364K MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
University of Texas System annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
University of Texas System reported 364K MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 263K MT in 2011 - a rise of 38.8% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| HAL C WEAVER POWER PLANT Power Plants AUSTIN, TX | AUSTIN, TX | 238K |
| University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston Other Galveston, TX | Galveston, TX | 64K |
| The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas Other Dallas, TX | Dallas, TX | 63K |
University of Texas System's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Power Plants is 65.2% of this parent's facility CO₂e (1 site) ; Other follows at 34.8% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
University of Texas System reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (364K MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (364K MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (121K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using University of Texas System's emissions profile
- University of Texas System runs high-intensity per facility (121K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
- It ranks #551 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.