EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Minerals
Summit Materials - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 3 facilities across 3 states (1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.5M
- Reporting facilities
- 3
- States covered
- 3
- Overall rank
- #253
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Summit Materials reported 1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 3 facilities in 3 states (ranks #253 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions decreased 12% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #253 of 2,289
- #21 in Minerals
- -12.2% since 2011
Summit Materials vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,521,750 253rd of 2289 higher than 2,036 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Summit Materials spreads its footprint vs Minerals peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Minerals companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (5 facilities, 3.57M MT).
You are here: Summit Materials.
Minerals peer footprint table: Summit Materials, 3 facilities, 1.52M MT CO2e. Holcim Participations (us), 12 facilities, 11.04M MT CO2e. Eagle Materials, 13 facilities, 5.84M MT CO2e. Rc Lonestar, 7 facilities, 5.59M MT CO2e. Lhoist North America, 10 facilities, 5.45M MT CO2e. Cemex, 7 facilities, 5.39M MT CO2e. Crh Americas, 7 facilities, 4.37M MT CO2e. Heidelberg Materials US Cement, 6 facilities, 4.17M MT CO2e. Carmeuse Lime, 10 facilities, 4.13M MT CO2e. Martin Marietta Materials, 4 facilities, 4M MT CO2e. Graymont, 9 facilities, 3.71M MT CO2e. Taiheiyo Cement USA, 4 facilities, 3.57M MT CO2e. Hbm Holdings, 4 facilities, 3.45M MT CO2e. Argos USA, 4 facilities, 3.33M MT CO2e. Gcc of America, 5 facilities, 2.29M MT CO2e. Titan America, 2 facilities, 1.85M MT CO2e. Genesis Energy, 1 facilities, 1.82M MT CO2e. American Crystal Sugar, 5 facilities, 1.8M MT CO2e. National Cement CO, 2 facilities, 1.58M MT CO2e. Tata Chemicals Soda Ash Partners, 1 facilities, 1.54M MT CO2e. Votorantim Cimentos North America, 1 facilities, 1.43M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent summit-materials · 2023 #253 · 1.5M MT
CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-PAIR · SECTOR-MINERALS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.5M MT
- UPPER-Q #253/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Graphic Packaging Hol… · Pulp and Paper
- FAC-PAIR 3 facilities
- SPAN-PAIR 3 states
- SECTOR-MINERALS Minerals
- TREND-DOWN −12% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Graphic Packaging Holding · Pulp and Paper (±3K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Summit Materials: CH₄ is 8.8% of 1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 0.2%). Non-CO₂ gases total 9%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 91%
- 1.4M MT
- CH₄
- 8.8%
- 134K MT
- N₂O
- 0.2%
- 4K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Summit Materials
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Summit Materials - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Summit Materials's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
Emissions decline across reporting years
Summit Materials - declining annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.5M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Summit Materials annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Summit Materials reported 1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 1.7M MT in 2011 - a decline of 12.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (3)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Davenport Plant Minerals BUFFALO, IA | BUFFALO, IA | 841K |
| CONTINENTAL CEMENT COMPANY LLC Minerals HANNIBAL, MO | HANNIBAL, MO | 549K |
| Hamm Sanitary Landfill Waste LAWRENCE, KS | LAWRENCE, KS | 132K |
Where Summit Materials's reported CO₂e sits by state
55.3% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Iowa (1 site) ; next is Missouri at 36.1% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Summit Materials reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Summit Materials's reported CO₂e by EPA sector
Top sector Minerals is 91.3% of this parent's facility CO₂e (2 sites) ; Waste follows at 8.7% . Sector labels are EPA GHGRP facility industry_sector values.
Summit Materials reported facility CO₂e by EPA industry sector
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.5M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.5M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (3 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (507K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Summit Materials's emissions profile
- Summit Materials runs high-intensity per facility (507K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Minerals sector on the Minerals industry page.
- It ranks #253 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Minerals emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.