EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Pulp and Paper
Graphic Packaging Holding - top-third GHGRP parent
According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 6 facilities across 5 states (1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023).
- MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
- 1.5M
- Reporting facilities
- 6
- States covered
- 5
- Overall rank
- #254
Data updated May 2026
According to the EPA GHGRP, Graphic Packaging Holding reported 1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 6 facilities in 5 states (ranks #254 of 2,289 U.S. corporate GHG emitters by total reported CO₂e) Emissions increased 7% over the tracked period.
- Overall rank #254 of 2,289
- #2 in Pulp and Paper
- +7.2% since 2011
Graphic Packaging Holding vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies
Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company
1,518,256 254th of 2289 higher than 2,035 of 2,289 companies
GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023
How Graphic Packaging Holding spreads its footprint vs Pulp and Paper peers
Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 20 Pulp and Paper companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (4 facilities, 0.65M MT).
You are here: Graphic Packaging Holding.
Pulp and Paper peer footprint table: Graphic Packaging Holding, 6 facilities, 1.52M MT CO2e. Koch Industries, 20 facilities, 6.32M MT CO2e. Westrock, 24 facilities, 5.74M MT CO2e. International Paper, 21 facilities, 5.08M MT CO2e. The Procter & Gamble, 6 facilities, 1.51M MT CO2e. Packaging CORP of America, 8 facilities, 1.5M MT CO2e. Domtar, 7 facilities, 1.44M MT CO2e. Kimberly-Clark, 8 facilities, 1.03M MT CO2e. Nd Paper, 4 facilities, 0.77M MT CO2e. Billerud Americas, 3 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Clearwater Paper, 4 facilities, 0.65M MT CO2e. Ahlstrom-Munksjo North America Specialty Solutions, 4 facilities, 0.59M MT CO2e. Sappi North America, 3 facilities, 0.52M MT CO2e. Pratt Industries, 5 facilities, 0.51M MT CO2e. Sylvamo North America, 2 facilities, 0.49M MT CO2e. New-Indy Jv, 2 facilities, 0.47M MT CO2e. Hig Capital, 1 facilities, 0.46M MT CO2e. Pixelle Specialty Solutions, 3 facilities, 0.43M MT CO2e. Evergreen Packaging Group Holdings, 1 facilities, 0.4M MT CO2e. Nippon Paper Industries CO, 1 facilities, 0.38M MT CO2e.
EPA GHGRP inventory plate
Parent graphic-packaging-holding · 2023 #254 · 1.5M MT
CO2E-MID · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-MULTI · SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP · TREND-UP · BOOK-RICH
- CO2E-MID 1.5M MT
- UPPER-Q #254/2289
- PHOTO-FINISH Summit Materials · Minerals
- FAC-PAIR 6 facilities
- SPAN-MULTI 5 states
- SECTOR-PULP-AND-PAP Pulp and Paper
- TREND-UP +7% since 2011
- BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields
Nearest CO₂e peer: Summit Materials · Minerals (±3K MT)
Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.
2023 methane-weighted parent mix
Methane leads the non-CO₂ share for Graphic Packaging Holding: CH₄ is 7.7% of 1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023 (N₂O 1.7%). Non-CO₂ gases total 9.5%. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.
- CO₂
- 90.5%
- 1.4M MT
- CH₄
- 7.7%
- 117K MT
- N₂O
- 1.7%
- 26K MT
CO₂e neighbourhood around Graphic Packaging Holding
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.
Largest sites in a top-third parent book
Graphic Packaging Holding - top sites (MT CO₂e)
Graphic Packaging Holding's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e
High-emitter reporting timeline
Graphic Packaging Holding - high-emitter annual GHG
EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e
- Reported CO₂e in 2023
- 1.5M MT
- 13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
Graphic Packaging Holding annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023
Graphic Packaging Holding reported 1.5M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 1.4M MT in 2011 - a rise of 7.2% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.
Multi-site facilities (6)
| Facility | Location | Emissions (MT CO2e) |
|---|---|---|
| Graphic Packaging International - Augusta Pulp and Paper Augusta, GA | Augusta, GA | 397K |
| GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL LLC, West Monroe Mill Plant 31 Pulp and Paper WEST MONROE, LA | WEST MONROE, LA | 357K |
| Graphic Packaging International - Texarkana Mill Pulp and Paper QUEEN CITY, TX | QUEEN CITY, TX | 342K |
| Graphic Packaging International, Inc. Pulp and Paper KALAMAZOO, MI | KALAMAZOO, MI | 245K |
| GRAPHIC PACKAGING INTERNATIONAL Pulp and Paper MACON, GA | MACON, GA | 135K |
| GRAPHIC PACKAGING INT INC Pulp and Paper MIDDLETOWN, OH | MIDDLETOWN, OH | 42K |
Where Graphic Packaging Holding's reported CO₂e sits by state
35.1% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Georgia (2 sites) ; next is Louisiana at 23.5% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.
Graphic Packaging Holding reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state
Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent
Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (1.5M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.
Similar reported CO₂e
Nearest parent totals (1.5M MT here).
Similar facility book
Nearest reporting-facility counts (6 here).
Similar per-facility CO₂e
Nearest average MT per facility (253K MT here).
Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice
What to do with this
Using Graphic Packaging Holding's emissions profile
- Graphic Packaging Holding runs high-intensity per facility (253K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Pulp and Paper sector on the Pulp and Paper industry page.
- It ranks #254 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
- Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.
Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Pulp and Paper emitters · Methodology
Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.