EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

LS Power Development - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 22 facilities across 10 states (10.8M MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
10.8M
Reporting facilities
22
States covered
10
Overall rank
#41
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

10.8M MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, LS Power Development reported 10.8M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 22 facilities in 10 states (ranks among the top 5% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#41 of 2,289)) Emissions increased 157% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #41 of 2,289
  • #24 in Power Plants
  • +156.6% since 2011

LS Power Development vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

10,829,542 41st of 2289 higher than 2,248 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How LS Power Development spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (21 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 21 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 21 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: LS Power Development.

Power Plants peer footprint table: LS Power Development, 22 facilities, 10.83M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent ls-power-development · 2023 #41 · 10.8M MT

CO2E-LARGE · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-MULTI · SPAN-NATION · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-LARGE 10.8M MT
  • TOP-DECILE #41/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Republic Services · Waste
  • FAC-MULTI 22 facilities
  • SPAN-NATION 10 states
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-SURGE +157% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Republic Services · Waste (±108K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.9% of 10.8M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.1%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.9%
10.8M MT
CH₄
0%
5K MT
N₂O
0.1%
6K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around LS Power Development

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MHolcim Participations… · Min…11.0MWyoming Municipal Pow… · Pow…11.0MLS Power Development · Power…10.8MRepublic Services · Waste · …10.7MCps Energy · Power Plants · …10.6MPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around LS Power Development · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

LS Power Development - top sites (MT CO₂e)

Jack County Generation Facil…2.4MSpringdale Generating Statio…1.5MRolling Hills Generating LLC1.3MWest Deptford Energy Station884KArmstrong Power, LLC627KOcean State Power583KOcean State Power II490KJohnson County Generation Fa…481K

LS Power Development's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions growth across reporting years

LS Power Development - rising annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
10.8M MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
2M4M6M8M10M12M 2011201320152017201920212023 10.8M

LS Power Development annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

LS Power Development reported 10.8M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 4.2M MT in 2011 - a rise of 156.6% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Wide facility book (22)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
Jack County Generation Facility
Power Plants
JACKSBORO, TX
2.4M
Springdale Generating Station (55710)
Power Plants
SPRINGDALE, PA
1.5M
Rolling Hills Generating LLC
Power Plants
WILKESVILLE, OH
1.3M
West Deptford Energy Station
Power Plants
West Deptford, NJ
884K
Armstrong Power, LLC
Power Plants
SHELOCTA, PA
627K
Ocean State Power
Power Plants
HARRISVILLE, RI
583K
Ocean State Power II
Power Plants
HARRISVILLE, RI
490K
Johnson County Generation Facility
Power Plants
CLEBURNE, TX
481K
Troy Energy, LLC
Power Plants
LUCKEY, OH
476K
Santa Rosa Energy Center
Power Plants
PACE, FL
462K
R W Miller
Power Plants
PALO PINTO, TX
315K
Riverside Generating Company
Power Plants
CATLETTSBURG, KY
284K
Aurora Generating Station
Power Plants
AURORA, IL
218K
Chambersburg Units 12,13
Power Plants
CHAMBERSBURG, PA
135K
LSP University Park, LLC
Power Plants
UNIVERSITY PARK, IL
105K
Buchanan Units 1, 2
Power Plants
KEEN MOUNTAIN, VA
98K
Wallingford Energy, LLC
Power Plants
Wallingford, CT
91K
Springdale Generating Station (55196)
Power Plants
SPRINGDALE, PA
71K
Gans Generating Facility
Power Plants
Lake Lynn, PA
71K
Rockford Energy Center
Power Plants
ROCKFORD, IL
60K
University Park Energy
Power Plants
UNIVERSITY PARK, IL
46K
Rockford Energy Center II
Power Plants
ROCKFORD, IL
25K

Where LS Power Development's reported CO₂e sits by state

29.9% of this parent's latest facility CO₂e is in Texas (3 sites) ; next is Pennsylvania at 22.4% . Shares are GHGRP facility rollups for this parent, not state economy totals.

TX3.2MPA2.4MOH1.8MRI1.1MNJ884KFL462KIL455KKY284K
EPA GHGRP · LS Power Development facility CO₂e by state · May 2026

LS Power Development reported facility CO₂e concentration by U.S. state

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (10.8M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using LS Power Development's emissions profile

  • LS Power Development runs high-intensity per facility (492K MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #41 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.