EPA GHGRP · reporting year 2023 · Power Plants

Cps Energy - top-third GHGRP parent

According to the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP), an upper-third Scope 1 reporter: 5 facilities across 1 state (10.6M MT CO₂e in 2023).

MT CO₂e (latest facility reports)
10.6M
Reporting facilities
5
States covered
1
Overall rank
#43
Watchlist RSS for this company

Data updated May 2026

10.6M MT CO₂e · 2023

According to the EPA GHGRP, Cps Energy reported 10.6M MT CO₂e in 2023 across 5 facilities in 1 state (ranks among the top 5% of U.S. corporate GHG emitters (#43 of 2,289)) Emissions decreased 13% over the tracked period.

  • Overall rank #43 of 2,289
  • #25 in Power Plants
  • -12.9% since 2011

Cps Energy vs all U.S. GHGRP parent companies

Where this parent's reported Scope 1 CO₂e sits among every EPA GHGRP-reporting company

10,609,733 43rd of 2289 higher than 2,246 of 2,289 companies

GHGRP parent companies, banded by reported CO₂e (MT)

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more companies. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program · 2023

How Cps Energy spreads its footprint vs Power Plants peers

Facility count against total reported CO₂e for 21 Power Plants companies. A company can lead its sector from one concentrated site or from many smaller ones; the split below uses the median of this peer group (19 facilities, 26.77M MT).

Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 21 entities by Reporting facilities (X) and Total CO₂e (million MT) (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Large & distributedFew sites, outsized footprintMany sites, modest footprintSmall & concentrated 01020304050 0M20M40M60M80M100M Reporting facilities Total CO₂e (million MT) Facility count vs. total reported CO₂e, Power Plants
Median split: 19 facilities, 26.77M MT CO₂e among Power Plants peers.

You are here: Cps Energy.

Power Plants peer footprint table: Cps Energy, 5 facilities, 10.61M MT CO2e. Vistra, 40 facilities, 86.32M MT CO2e. The Southern, 26 facilities, 78.01M MT CO2e. Duke Energy, 39 facilities, 65.01M MT CO2e. CPN Management, 43 facilities, 47.58M MT CO2e. Nextera Energy, 19 facilities, 45.57M MT CO2e. American Electric Power CO, 22 facilities, 44.72M MT CO2e. Berkshire Hathaway, 27 facilities, 39.8M MT CO2e. US Government, 21 facilities, 38.21M MT CO2e. Entergy, 23 facilities, 33.86M MT CO2e. Xcel Energy, 28 facilities, 29.03M MT CO2e. PPL, 6 facilities, 26.77M MT CO2e. Dominion Energy, 22 facilities, 25.19M MT CO2e. DTE Energy, 12 facilities, 22.31M MT CO2e. NRG Energy, 14 facilities, 22.1M MT CO2e. Ameren, 11 facilities, 19.88M MT CO2e. Evergy, 12 facilities, 19.87M MT CO2e. Lightstone Generation, 4 facilities, 19.14M MT CO2e. Talen Energy, 11 facilities, 17.72M MT CO2e. Associated Electric Cooperative, 7 facilities, 15.57M MT CO2e. Aes, 8 facilities, 15.45M MT CO2e.

EPA GHGRP inventory plate

Parent cps-energy · 2023 #43 · 10.6M MT

CO2E-LARGE · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · FAC-PAIR · SPAN-HOME · SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS · TREND-DOWN · BOOK-RICH

  • CO2E-LARGE 10.6M MT
  • TOP-DECILE #43/2289
  • PHOTO-FINISH Archer Daniels Midland · Other
  • FAC-PAIR 5 facilities
  • SPAN-HOME 1 state
  • SECTOR-POWER-PLANTS Power Plants
  • TREND-DOWN −13% since 2011
  • BOOK-RICH 7/8 fields

Nearest CO₂e peer: Archer Daniels Midland · Other (±24K MT)

Upper-third parent rollup stamps: CO₂e band, corpus rank, peer, facility book, state span, sector, trend. Not an EPA grade.

2023 nearly all-CO₂ parent book

This parent's 2023 facility book is almost entirely CO₂ (99.7% of 10.6M MT CO₂e). CH₄ and N₂O together are only 0.3%, a CO₂-shaped GHGRP profile, not a methane story. Component shares sum this parent's facility CO₂ / CH₄ / N₂O rows for that year, not a corporate Scope 1-3 inventory.

CO₂
99.7%
10.6M MT
CH₄
0%
4K MT
N₂O
0.3%
31K MT

CO₂e neighbourhood around Cps Energy

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest reported parents by CO₂e, not a full GHGRP corpus board reprint.

Vistra · Power Plants · high…86.3MLS Power Development · Power…10.8MRepublic Services · Waste · …10.7MCps Energy · Power Plants · …10.6MArcher Daniels Midland · Oth…10.6MEnergy Transfer · Petroleum …10.5MPelican Renewables · Other ·…0
EPA GHGRP parent CO₂e · neighbourhood around Cps Energy · May 2026

Largest sites in a top-third parent book

Cps Energy - top sites (MT CO₂e)

J K Spruce5.6MV H Braunig2.1MRio Nogales Power Project, LP1.7MO W Sommers1.1MLeon Creek123K

Cps Energy's largest facilities by latest available reported CO₂e

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Emissions decline across reporting years

Cps Energy - declining annual GHG

EPA GHGRP 2011–2023 · million metric tons CO₂e

Reported CO₂e in 2023
10.6M MT
13 annual EPA GHGRP reporting records
7M8M9M10M11M12M13M 2011201320152017201920212023 10.6M

Cps Energy annual reported GHG emissions, 2011–2023

Source: EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP) As of Reporting year 2023

Cps Energy reported 10.6M MT CO₂e in 2023, compared with 12.2M MT in 2011 - a decline of 12.9% across the EPA GHGRP reporting record.

Multi-site facilities (5)

Facility Emissions (MT CO2e)
J K Spruce
Power Plants
SAN ANTONIO, TX
5.6M
V H Braunig
Power Plants
ELMENDORF, TX
2.1M
Rio Nogales Power Project, LP
Power Plants
SEGUIN, TX
1.7M
O W Sommers
Power Plants
SAN ANTONIO, TX
1.1M
Leon Creek
Power Plants
SAN ANTONIO, TX
123K

Nationwide peers for a top-third GHGRP parent

Three EPA GHGRP peer sets for a top-third parent (10.6M MT): nearest totals, facility-book size, then per-facility intensity.

Source: EPA GHGRP Data is based on facility self-reporting. Not environmental compliance advice

What to do with this

Using Cps Energy's emissions profile

  • Cps Energy runs high-intensity per facility (2.1M MT CO₂e/site); see how it stacks up against the rest of the Power Plants sector on the Power Plants industry page.
  • It ranks #43 of 2,289 reporting parents nationwide, compare it directly against specific peers on the compare tool.
  • Not sure how to read a total-CO₂e figure or a per-facility intensity number, the how-to-read guide walks through what each field means and what it doesn't.

Related reading: How to read an emissions profile · Power Plants emitters · Methodology

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.